Did this video mention our pricing? Quote it with the timestamp.What comes backThe sentence, the minute, and the speaker — or a clear statement that the topic never came up.
Open-source personal assistant · release v2026.8.1
OpenClaw treats a skill as something with a lifecycle — install, review, then enable per agent — and answers wherever you already chat, so the reply has to hold up on its own.
What comes back is text with minutes attached. That is what makes a chat reply checkable — anyone in the thread can jump to 22:10 and hear it themselves.
Let us start with the part everyone quoted this week — the pricing change.
The list price did not move. What changed is that the entry tier loses the seat minimum.
For teams under ten seats, that is a real reduction, and it is not the headline anybody wrote.
So the coverage got the price wrong by leaving out the condition.
Mostly, yes. Two outlets did check it with us first.
The list price did not move. What changed is that the entry tier loses the seat minimum.
This is a small skill with a narrow job, so the enablement question is straightforward: which agents should be able to answer when somebody pastes a video.
clawhub install felo-youtube-subtitlingMain chat agentEnabledThe likely place a link arrives, and the place where a fast, quoted answer saves the most time.
Research agentEnabledUseful when a claim in a report came from a talk; the transcript can be re-checked at the source.
Team channelReview firstEnable once the people in the channel know the transcript comes from auto-captions and occasionally mangles a name.
Three messages, and the third is the one people remember.
Somebody drops a video into a channel with an opinion already attached to it.
One request: get the transcript and quote the part about the specific claim. That keeps the reply tied to the recording instead of the mood of the thread.
The minute is what lets anybody in the channel check it without watching. It also ends the argument about what somebody meant.
Reply in the thread where the link was posted. A correction in a direct message leaves the wrong version standing for everyone else.
Leaves behindA quoted correction with timestamps, posted in the thread where the original claim was shared.
Short questions, quoted answers, no summary of the whole recording.
Did this video mention our pricing? Quote it with the timestamp.What comes backThe sentence, the minute, and the speaker — or a clear statement that the topic never came up.
Pull every number from this talk with its timestamp. I do not need the rest.What comes backA short list of figures anchored to minutes, which is enough to check a claim somebody made in the thread.
A quotation in a chat is taken at face value, so the checks happen before you send it, not after.
Open the video at the minute quoted. A quote with no timestamp cannot be checked, which is the whole reason to ask for one.
Auto-captions mangle both. If a figure is going to be repeated in a channel, confirm it against the audio.
Speakers hedge, and captions drop the tone. Read one line either side before you repeat it as a position.
Five skills written for OpenClaw 2.0. They follow the same pattern on this platform, so you can combine them in one session without re-explaining your setup.
Start with a skill, then compose the exact models, live data, knowledge, and output tools your OpenClaw 2.0 workflow needs — the same key every Felo skill already uses.
Use cost-efficient LLM access when your agent needs custom reasoning or generation.
Give agents current web and social signals instead of relying on stale context.
Ground work in reusable knowledge, then turn it into shareable deliverables.
Extend the workflow from research to visual and office-ready results.